Impact of the practising anesthesiologist team member on the laryngeal mask cuff pressures and adverse event rate

Objective: We have planned to evaluate the laryngeal mask cuff pressures (LMcp) inflated by anesthesia workers of several seniority, without using manometer. Methods: 180 patients scheduled to have short duration surgery with laryngeal mask were included in the study. Five anesthesia specialists (Group S), 10 residents (Group R) and 6 technicians (Group T) inflated the LMc; thereafter LMcp were measured with pressure manometer. Participants have repeated this practice in at least five different cases. LMcp higher than 60 cm H2O at the initial placement or intraoperative period were adjusted to normal range. Sore throat was questioned postoperatively. Groups were compared in terms of mean LMcp and occupational experience. Results: At the settlement of LM, LMcp pressures within the normal range were determined in 26 (14.4%) cases. Mean LMcp after LM placement in Group S, R and T were 101.2 +/- 14.0, 104.3+/-20.5 cm H2O and 105.2 18.4 cm H2O respectively (p >0.05). Mean LMcp values in all measurement time periods within the groups were above the normal limit (60 cm H2O). When groups were compared in terms of LMcp, no difference has been found among pressure values. Occupational experience was 14.2 3.9; 3.3 1.1 and 6.6 3.8 years for specialists, residents and technicians respectively and measured pressure values were not different in regard of occupational experience. Seven (3.9%) patients had sore throat at the 24th hour interview. Conclusion: Considering lower possibility of normal adjustment of LMcp and ineffectiveness of occupational experience to obtain normal pressure values, it is suitable that all anesthesia practitioners should adjust LMcp with manometer. (C) 2013 Sociedade Brasileira de Anestesiologia. Published by Elsevier Editora Ltda. All rights reserved.

Yazar Yurtlu, Bulent Serhan
Hanci, Volkan
Koksal, Bengu
Okyay, Dilek
Ayoglu, Hilal
Turan, Isil Ozkocak
Yayın Türü Article
Tek Biçim Adres https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12628/2756
Tek Biçim Adres 10.1016/j.bjan.2013.03.005
Konu Başlıkları Laryngeal mask
airway
Pressure
Anesthesia
Koleksiyonlar Araştırma Çıktıları | WoS | Scopus | TR-Dizin | PubMed | SOBİAD
PubMed İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
Dergi Adı REVISTA BRASILEIRA DE ANESTESIOLOGIA
Dergi Cilt Bilgisi 65
Dergi Sayısı 6
Sayfalar 455 - 460
Yayın Yılı 2015
Eser Adı
[dc.title]
Impact of the practising anesthesiologist team member on the laryngeal mask cuff pressures and adverse event rate
Yazar
[dc.contributor.author]
Yurtlu, Bulent Serhan
Yazar
[dc.contributor.author]
Hanci, Volkan
Yazar
[dc.contributor.author]
Koksal, Bengu
Yazar
[dc.contributor.author]
Okyay, Dilek
Yazar
[dc.contributor.author]
Ayoglu, Hilal
Yazar
[dc.contributor.author]
Turan, Isil Ozkocak
Yayın Yılı
[dc.date.issued]
2015
Yayıncı
[dc.publisher]
ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
Yayın Türü
[dc.type]
article
Özet
[dc.description.abstract]
Objective: We have planned to evaluate the laryngeal mask cuff pressures (LMcp) inflated by anesthesia workers of several seniority, without using manometer. Methods: 180 patients scheduled to have short duration surgery with laryngeal mask were included in the study. Five anesthesia specialists (Group S), 10 residents (Group R) and 6 technicians (Group T) inflated the LMc; thereafter LMcp were measured with pressure manometer. Participants have repeated this practice in at least five different cases. LMcp higher than 60 cm H2O at the initial placement or intraoperative period were adjusted to normal range. Sore throat was questioned postoperatively. Groups were compared in terms of mean LMcp and occupational experience. Results: At the settlement of LM, LMcp pressures within the normal range were determined in 26 (14.4%) cases. Mean LMcp after LM placement in Group S, R and T were 101.2 +/- 14.0, 104.3+/-20.5 cm H2O and 105.2 18.4 cm H2O respectively (p >0.05). Mean LMcp values in all measurement time periods within the groups were above the normal limit (60 cm H2O). When groups were compared in terms of LMcp, no difference has been found among pressure values. Occupational experience was 14.2 3.9; 3.3 1.1 and 6.6 3.8 years for specialists, residents and technicians respectively and measured pressure values were not different in regard of occupational experience. Seven (3.9%) patients had sore throat at the 24th hour interview. Conclusion: Considering lower possibility of normal adjustment of LMcp and ineffectiveness of occupational experience to obtain normal pressure values, it is suitable that all anesthesia practitioners should adjust LMcp with manometer. (C) 2013 Sociedade Brasileira de Anestesiologia. Published by Elsevier Editora Ltda. All rights reserved.
Açıklama
[dc.description]
WOS: 000367513200005
Açıklama
[dc.description]
PubMed: 26614141
Kayıt Giriş Tarihi
[dc.date.accessioned]
2019-12-23
Açık Erişim Tarihi
[dc.date.available]
2019-12-23
Yayın Dili
[dc.language.iso]
por
Konu Başlıkları
[dc.subject]
Laryngeal mask
Konu Başlıkları
[dc.subject]
airway
Konu Başlıkları
[dc.subject]
Pressure
Konu Başlıkları
[dc.subject]
Anesthesia
Haklar
[dc.rights]
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
ISSN
[dc.identifier.issn]
0034-7094
ISSN
[dc.identifier.issn]
1806-907X
İlk Sayfa Sayısı
[dc.identifier.startpage]
455
Son Sayfa Sayısı
[dc.identifier.endpage]
460
Dergi Adı
[dc.relation.journal]
REVISTA BRASILEIRA DE ANESTESIOLOGIA
Dergi Sayısı
[dc.identifier.issue]
6
Dergi Cilt Bilgisi
[dc.identifier.volume]
65
Tek Biçim Adres
[dc.identifier.uri]
https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bjan.2013.03.005
Tek Biçim Adres
[dc.identifier.uri]
https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12628/2756
Görüntülenme Sayısı ( Şehir )
Görüntülenme Sayısı ( Ülke )
Görüntülenme Sayısı ( Zaman Dağılımı )
Görüntülenme
30
09.12.2022 tarihinden bu yana
İndirme
1
09.12.2022 tarihinden bu yana
Son Erişim Tarihi
05 Şubat 2024 20:46
Google Kontrol
Tıklayınız
normal pressure values experience occupational (Group manometer anesthesia respectively residents placement throat technicians different measured compared within specialists laryngeal pressures patients inflated groups measurement periods Occupational difference practitioners should adjust Sociedade Brasileira Anestesiologia suitable Published
6698 sayılı Kişisel Verilerin Korunması Kanunu kapsamında yükümlülüklerimiz ve çerez politikamız hakkında bilgi sahibi olmak için alttaki bağlantıyı kullanabilirsiniz.

creativecommons
Bu site altında yer alan tüm kaynaklar Creative Commons Alıntı-GayriTicari-Türetilemez 4.0 Uluslararası Lisansı ile lisanslanmıştır.
Platforms