Comparison of the amount of apical debris extrusion associated with different retreatment systems and supplementary file application during retreatment process

Background: The type of instrument affects the amount of debris extruded. The aim of this study was to compare the effect of retreatment systems and supplementary file application on the amount of apical debris extrusion. Materials and Methods: Forty-eight extracted mandibular premolars with a single canal and similar length were selected. The root canals were prepared with the ProTaper Universal system with a torque-controlled engine. The root canals were dried and were obturated using Gutta-percha and sealer. The specimens were randomly divided into four equal groups according to the retreatment procedures (Group 1, Mtwo retreatment files; Group 2, Mtwo retreatment files + Mtwo rotary file #30 supplementary file; Group 3, ProTaper Universal retreatment (PTUR) files; and Group 4, PTUR files + ProTaper F3 supplementary file). The extruded debris during instrumentation were collected into preweighed Eppendorf tubes. The amount of apically extruded debris was calculated by subtracting the initial weight of the tube from the final weight. Three consecutive weights were obtained for each tube. Results: No statistically significant difference was found in the amount of apically extruded debris between Groups 1 and 3 (P = 0.590). A significant difference was observed between Groups 1 and 2 (P < 0.05), and between Groups 3 and 4 (P < 0.05). Conclusions: The use of supplementary file significantly increased the amount of apically extruded debris. © 2016 Journal of Conservative Dentistry | Published by Wolters Kluwer -Medknow.

Yazar Çiçek E.
Koçak M.
Koçak S.
Saglam B.
Yayın Türü Article
Tek Biçim Adres https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12628/4836
Tek Biçim Adres 10.4103/0972-0707.186456
Konu Başlıkları Apical extrusion
retreatment
retreatment system
supplementary file
Koleksiyonlar Araştırma Çıktıları | WoS | Scopus | TR-Dizin | PubMed | SOBİAD
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
Dergi Adı Journal of Conservative Dentistry
Dergi Cilt Bilgisi 19
Dergi Sayısı 4
Sayfalar 351 - 354
Yayın Yılı 2016
Eser Adı
[dc.title]
Comparison of the amount of apical debris extrusion associated with different retreatment systems and supplementary file application during retreatment process
Yazar
[dc.contributor.author]
Çiçek E.
Yazar
[dc.contributor.author]
Koçak M.
Yazar
[dc.contributor.author]
Koçak S.
Yazar
[dc.contributor.author]
Saglam B.
Yayın Yılı
[dc.date.issued]
2016
Yayıncı
[dc.publisher]
Medknow Publications
Yayın Türü
[dc.type]
article
Özet
[dc.description.abstract]
Background: The type of instrument affects the amount of debris extruded. The aim of this study was to compare the effect of retreatment systems and supplementary file application on the amount of apical debris extrusion. Materials and Methods: Forty-eight extracted mandibular premolars with a single canal and similar length were selected. The root canals were prepared with the ProTaper Universal system with a torque-controlled engine. The root canals were dried and were obturated using Gutta-percha and sealer. The specimens were randomly divided into four equal groups according to the retreatment procedures (Group 1, Mtwo retreatment files; Group 2, Mtwo retreatment files + Mtwo rotary file #30 supplementary file; Group 3, ProTaper Universal retreatment (PTUR) files; and Group 4, PTUR files + ProTaper F3 supplementary file). The extruded debris during instrumentation were collected into preweighed Eppendorf tubes. The amount of apically extruded debris was calculated by subtracting the initial weight of the tube from the final weight. Three consecutive weights were obtained for each tube. Results: No statistically significant difference was found in the amount of apically extruded debris between Groups 1 and 3 (P = 0.590). A significant difference was observed between Groups 1 and 2 (P < 0.05), and between Groups 3 and 4 (P < 0.05). Conclusions: The use of supplementary file significantly increased the amount of apically extruded debris. © 2016 Journal of Conservative Dentistry | Published by Wolters Kluwer -Medknow.
Kayıt Giriş Tarihi
[dc.date.accessioned]
2019-12-23
Açık Erişim Tarihi
[dc.date.available]
2019-12-23
Yayın Dili
[dc.language.iso]
eng
Konu Başlıkları
[dc.subject]
Apical extrusion
Konu Başlıkları
[dc.subject]
retreatment
Konu Başlıkları
[dc.subject]
retreatment system
Konu Başlıkları
[dc.subject]
supplementary file
Haklar
[dc.rights]
info:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess
ISSN
[dc.identifier.issn]
0972-0707
İlk Sayfa Sayısı
[dc.identifier.startpage]
351
Son Sayfa Sayısı
[dc.identifier.endpage]
354
Dergi Adı
[dc.relation.journal]
Journal of Conservative Dentistry
Dergi Sayısı
[dc.identifier.issue]
4
Dergi Cilt Bilgisi
[dc.identifier.volume]
19
Tek Biçim Adres
[dc.identifier.uri]
https://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0972-0707.186456
Tek Biçim Adres
[dc.identifier.uri]
https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12628/4836
Görüntülenme Sayısı ( Şehir )
Görüntülenme Sayısı ( Ülke )
Görüntülenme Sayısı ( Zaman Dağılımı )
Görüntülenme
39
09.12.2022 tarihinden bu yana
İndirme
1
09.12.2022 tarihinden bu yana
Son Erişim Tarihi
18 Mayıs 2024 17:08
Google Kontrol
Tıklayınız
debris retreatment amount extruded supplementary apically ProTaper Groups between Universal significant weight difference canals significantly Dentistry initial Wolters Published subtracting Kluwer calculated -Medknow Eppendorf consecutive Journal Conclusions observed increased collected weights Conservative statistically Results obtained
6698 sayılı Kişisel Verilerin Korunması Kanunu kapsamında yükümlülüklerimiz ve çerez politikamız hakkında bilgi sahibi olmak için alttaki bağlantıyı kullanabilirsiniz.

creativecommons
Bu site altında yer alan tüm kaynaklar Creative Commons Alıntı-GayriTicari-Türetilemez 4.0 Uluslararası Lisansı ile lisanslanmıştır.
Platforms