Cleaning efficacy of reciprocal and rotary systems in the removal of root canal filling material

Aim: The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of hand file, nickel titanium rotary instrument, and two reciprocating instruments for removing gutta-percha and sealer from the root canals. Materials and Methods: Eighty-eight mandibular premolar teeth were used. The root canals were shaped and filled with gutta-percha and a resin-based sealer. The specimens were divided into four groups according to the technique by which the root filling material was removed: Group 1 - Wave One; Group 2 - Reciproc; Group 3 - ProTaper; and Group 4 - Gates-Glidden burs and stainless steel hand file. Then teeth were split longitudinally and photographed. The images were transferred to a computer. The ratio of remaining filling material to the root canal periphery was calculated with the aid of ImageJ software. Statistical analysis was performed using Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney tests. Results: A significant difference was found among all groups (P < 0.001). The WaveOne group demonstrated significantly less remaining filling material. The greatest amount of filling material was found in specimens where gutta-percha was removed with Gates-Glidden burs and stainless steel hand file. Conclusion: The reciprocating files were found to be significantly more effective in removing the filling material from the canal walls compared to the rotational file and hand file. © 2016 Journal of Conservative Dentistry.

Yazar Koçak M.M.
Koçak S.
Turker S.A.
Sağlam B.C.
Yayın Türü Article
Tek Biçim Adres https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12628/4695
Tek Biçim Adres 10.4103/0972-0707.178706
Konu Başlıkları Reciprocating motion
Retreatment
Rotary systems
Koleksiyonlar Araştırma Çıktıları | WoS | Scopus | TR-Dizin | PubMed | SOBİAD
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
Dergi Adı Journal of Conservative Dentistry
Dergi Cilt Bilgisi 19
Dergi Sayısı 2
Sayfalar 184 - 188
Yayın Yılı 2016
Eser Adı
[dc.title]
Cleaning efficacy of reciprocal and rotary systems in the removal of root canal filling material
Yazar
[dc.contributor.author]
Koçak M.M.
Yazar
[dc.contributor.author]
Koçak S.
Yazar
[dc.contributor.author]
Turker S.A.
Yazar
[dc.contributor.author]
Sağlam B.C.
Yayın Yılı
[dc.date.issued]
2016
Yayıncı
[dc.publisher]
Medknow Publications
Yayın Türü
[dc.type]
article
Özet
[dc.description.abstract]
Aim: The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of hand file, nickel titanium rotary instrument, and two reciprocating instruments for removing gutta-percha and sealer from the root canals. Materials and Methods: Eighty-eight mandibular premolar teeth were used. The root canals were shaped and filled with gutta-percha and a resin-based sealer. The specimens were divided into four groups according to the technique by which the root filling material was removed: Group 1 - Wave One; Group 2 - Reciproc; Group 3 - ProTaper; and Group 4 - Gates-Glidden burs and stainless steel hand file. Then teeth were split longitudinally and photographed. The images were transferred to a computer. The ratio of remaining filling material to the root canal periphery was calculated with the aid of ImageJ software. Statistical analysis was performed using Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney tests. Results: A significant difference was found among all groups (P < 0.001). The WaveOne group demonstrated significantly less remaining filling material. The greatest amount of filling material was found in specimens where gutta-percha was removed with Gates-Glidden burs and stainless steel hand file. Conclusion: The reciprocating files were found to be significantly more effective in removing the filling material from the canal walls compared to the rotational file and hand file. © 2016 Journal of Conservative Dentistry.
Kayıt Giriş Tarihi
[dc.date.accessioned]
2019-12-23
Açık Erişim Tarihi
[dc.date.available]
2019-12-23
Yayın Dili
[dc.language.iso]
eng
Konu Başlıkları
[dc.subject]
Reciprocating motion
Konu Başlıkları
[dc.subject]
Retreatment
Konu Başlıkları
[dc.subject]
Rotary systems
Haklar
[dc.rights]
info:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess
ISSN
[dc.identifier.issn]
0972-0707
İlk Sayfa Sayısı
[dc.identifier.startpage]
184
Son Sayfa Sayısı
[dc.identifier.endpage]
188
Dergi Adı
[dc.relation.journal]
Journal of Conservative Dentistry
Dergi Sayısı
[dc.identifier.issue]
2
Dergi Cilt Bilgisi
[dc.identifier.volume]
19
Tek Biçim Adres
[dc.identifier.uri]
https://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0972-0707.178706
Tek Biçim Adres
[dc.identifier.uri]
https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12628/4695
Görüntülenme Sayısı ( Şehir )
Görüntülenme Sayısı ( Ülke )
Görüntülenme Sayısı ( Zaman Dağılımı )
Görüntülenme
12
09.12.2022 tarihinden bu yana
İndirme
1
09.12.2022 tarihinden bu yana
Son Erişim Tarihi
07 Şubat 2024 22:35
Google Kontrol
Tıklayınız
filling material gutta-percha removed Gates-Glidden groups specimens stainless significantly remaining canals reciprocating sealer removing Conservative Results rotational Mann-Whitney Journal performed Kruskal-Wallis significant analysis Statistical software ImageJ Dentistry effective difference greatest Conclusion demonstrated calculated WaveOne compared
6698 sayılı Kişisel Verilerin Korunması Kanunu kapsamında yükümlülüklerimiz ve çerez politikamız hakkında bilgi sahibi olmak için alttaki bağlantıyı kullanabilirsiniz.

creativecommons
Bu site altında yer alan tüm kaynaklar Creative Commons Alıntı-GayriTicari-Türetilemez 4.0 Uluslararası Lisansı ile lisanslanmıştır.
Platforms