Nephrolithiasis in ankylosing spondylitis and its relationship with disease assessment scales

Rezvani, Aylin | Aktas, Ilknur | Tastekin, Nurettin | Celiker, Reyhan | Sarikaya, Selda | Dursun, Erbil | Ozdolap, Senay

Article | 2019 | NORTHERN CLINICS OF ISTANBUL6 ( 3 ) , pp.254 - 259

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to investigate the frequency of renal calculi in patients with ankylosing spondylitis (AS) and to determine its relationship with disease assessment variables. METHODS: The study was designed retrospectively, and it included a cohort of 320 patients with AS diagnosed using the Modified New York Criteria. A total of 119 patients who underwent renal ultrasonography (USG), in who the erythrocyte sedimentation rate, C-reactive protein, blood calcium, phosphorus, Vitamin D, parathormone, and urinary calcium excretion were measured, and who also had lateral cervical and lumbar radiography in the same t . . .ime period were extracted from the cohort. All patients' demographic characteristics and the results of blood and urine tests were recorded. The Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI), Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index (BASFI), Ankylosing Spondylitis Mobility Index (BASMI), and Modified Stoke Ankylosing Spondylitis Spinal Score (mSASSS) were evaluated in all patients. RESULTS: Thirteen of the 119 patients had renal calculi confirmed by USG data. The frequency of nephrolithiasis detected by USG was 10.9% in patients with AS. The disease lasted significantly longer in patients with renal calculi ([nephrolithiasis (+): 18.39 +/- 8.72 years; nephrolithiasis (-): 12.02 +/- 8.43 years, p=0.01]). The BASMI total score was significantly higher in the group of patients with renal calculi. There was not any significant difference in terms of blood samples, HLA-B27, BASDAI, BASFI, and mSASSS between groups. CONCLUSION: The frequency of renal stones is increased in patients with AS compared to healthy population. Especially patients who had AS for a long time and higher BASMI values are more susceptible to renal calculi. It is important to point out that the results of this type of studies would be more reliable if the study is conducted on large patient groups and population-based prevalence Daha fazlası Daha az

Psychological status and patient-assessed health instruments in ankylosing spondylitis

Ortancil O. | Konuk N. | May H. | Sanli A. | Ozturk D. | Ankarali H.

Article | 2010 | Journal of Clinical Rheumatology16 ( 7 ) , pp.313 - 316

Background: Determination of the relationships between disease and psychological status in ankylosing spondylitis (AS) is needed for clinical assessment and management, as well as selection and monitoring of AS patients for biological therapy. Objective: The study aimed to describe associations between self-reported health status and psychological factors in AS patients and to compare the Symptom Checklist 90-Revised (SCL-90-R) profiles of the AS patients and the control subjects. Methods: Disease status was determined through the Bath AS Disease Activity Index (BASDAI), Bath AS Functional Index (BASFI), and the Bath AS Metrology In . . .dex (BASMI). Psychological status was measured using the SCL-90-R. Results: BASDAI and BASFI scores correlated with somatization, anxiety, obsessive-compulsive, depression, and hostility subscales of SCL-90-R (P ? 0.05). BASFI scores were significantly correlated with interpersonal sensitivity and phobic anxiety subscales of SCL-90-R (P < 0.05), whereas no correlation was observed between BASDAI and interpersonal sensitivity and phobic anxiety subscales. BASMI scores were significantly correlated with somatization and interpersonal sensitivity subscales (P < 0.05). After age and sex adjustments, a statistically significant difference was determined between the somatization scores of the AS patients and control subjects (P = 0.005). Conclusion: AS is a chronic disease, which causes deformities and workforce decline. This, in turn, might lead to psychological distress. There is a need to assess the mood of patients with AS. Completion of self-report assessment tools are potentially confounded by reporting biases that result from psychological factors. Some patients may overreport symptoms or disability because of a tendency to somatize. Thus, during interpretation of these tools, psychological status should be taken into account especially deciding the treatment regimen including biologic therapies. Copyright © 2010 by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Daha fazlası Daha az

6698 sayılı Kişisel Verilerin Korunması Kanunu kapsamında yükümlülüklerimiz ve çerez politikamız hakkında bilgi sahibi olmak için alttaki bağlantıyı kullanabilirsiniz.

Bu site altında yer alan tüm kaynaklar Creative Commons Alıntı-GayriTicari-Türetilemez 4.0 Uluslararası Lisansı ile lisanslanmıştır.