Clinical results of transurethral electrovaporization resection of prostate (TUVRP) with two different electrodes versus TURP: A randomized prospective clinical study [Prostatin Iki Farkli Elektrotla Yapilan Transüretral Elektrovaporizasyon Rezeksiyonu (TUVRP) ile TURP Kli?ik Sonuçlarinin Karşilaştirilmasi: Randomize Prospektif Kl·inik Bir Çalişma]

Introduction: The aim of our study was to compare the results of conventional transurethral electroresection of the prostate (TURP) and transurethral vaporization and resection of the prostate (TUVRP) operations in patients with symptomatic bladder outlet obstruction due to prostatic enlargement. Materials and Methods: 59 consecutive patients with symptomatic bladder outlet obstruction due to prostatic enlargement and prostate size between 20-60 g were prospectively randomized to two treatment groups; one group underwent standard TURP and the other TUVRP. Eligibility criteria included IPSS result 8 or grater, Qmax <15 ml/sec and prostate volume of 20 to 60 gm on transrectal ultrasonography. Patients less than 50 years old and those with a known neurogenic bladder, cancer of the prostate or bladder, history of prostate surgery or currently taking medications known to affect voiding function (alfa blockers) were excluded from this study. Patients were followed-up at 1, 3 and 12 months after treatment. International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), maximum flow rate (Qmax), post-voiding residual urine volume (PVR) and transrectal ultrasound results were recorded during the follow-up period. Kruskal-Wallis variance analysis, Wilcoxon test and Bonferroni corrected Wilcoxon test was used for statistical analysis to compare the preoperative and postoperative data. Results: With respect to efficacy parameters (IPSS, Qmax, PVR and prostate volume) we did not observe statistically significant difference among those groups (TURP and TUVRP). Also the complications were similar on both groups. Conclusions: TUVRP seems to be a safe and efficacious modification of TURP (with) and the main advantage of this technique is to produce a more accurate TURP operation with less hemorrhage by improving surgeon's comfort during the resection.

Yazar Özdiler E.
Yaman Ö.
Soyupek S.
Seçkiner I.
Bozlu M.
Tükel O.
Yayın Türü Article
Tek Biçim Adres https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12628/4715
Konu Başlıkları TURP
TUVRP
Vapor cut electrode
Vaporization of prostate
Koleksiyonlar Araştırma Çıktıları | WoS | Scopus | TR-Dizin | PubMed | SOBİAD
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
Dergi Adı Turk Uroloji Dergisi
Dergi Cilt Bilgisi 29
Dergi Sayısı 4
Sayfalar 481 - 485
Yayın Yılı 2003
Eser Adı
[dc.title]
Clinical results of transurethral electrovaporization resection of prostate (TUVRP) with two different electrodes versus TURP: A randomized prospective clinical study [Prostatin Iki Farkli Elektrotla Yapilan Transüretral Elektrovaporizasyon Rezeksiyonu (TUVRP) ile TURP Kli?ik Sonuçlarinin Karşilaştirilmasi: Randomize Prospektif Kl·inik Bir Çalişma]
Yazar
[dc.contributor.author]
Özdiler E.
Yazar
[dc.contributor.author]
Yaman Ö.
Yazar
[dc.contributor.author]
Soyupek S.
Yazar
[dc.contributor.author]
Seçkiner I.
Yazar
[dc.contributor.author]
Bozlu M.
Yazar
[dc.contributor.author]
Tükel O.
Yayın Yılı
[dc.date.issued]
2003
Yayın Türü
[dc.type]
article
Özet
[dc.description.abstract]
Introduction: The aim of our study was to compare the results of conventional transurethral electroresection of the prostate (TURP) and transurethral vaporization and resection of the prostate (TUVRP) operations in patients with symptomatic bladder outlet obstruction due to prostatic enlargement. Materials and Methods: 59 consecutive patients with symptomatic bladder outlet obstruction due to prostatic enlargement and prostate size between 20-60 g were prospectively randomized to two treatment groups; one group underwent standard TURP and the other TUVRP. Eligibility criteria included IPSS result 8 or grater, Qmax <15 ml/sec and prostate volume of 20 to 60 gm on transrectal ultrasonography. Patients less than 50 years old and those with a known neurogenic bladder, cancer of the prostate or bladder, history of prostate surgery or currently taking medications known to affect voiding function (alfa blockers) were excluded from this study. Patients were followed-up at 1, 3 and 12 months after treatment. International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), maximum flow rate (Qmax), post-voiding residual urine volume (PVR) and transrectal ultrasound results were recorded during the follow-up period. Kruskal-Wallis variance analysis, Wilcoxon test and Bonferroni corrected Wilcoxon test was used for statistical analysis to compare the preoperative and postoperative data. Results: With respect to efficacy parameters (IPSS, Qmax, PVR and prostate volume) we did not observe statistically significant difference among those groups (TURP and TUVRP). Also the complications were similar on both groups. Conclusions: TUVRP seems to be a safe and efficacious modification of TURP (with) and the main advantage of this technique is to produce a more accurate TURP operation with less hemorrhage by improving surgeon's comfort during the resection.
Kayıt Giriş Tarihi
[dc.date.accessioned]
2019-12-23
Açık Erişim Tarihi
[dc.date.available]
2019-12-23
Yayın Dili
[dc.language.iso]
tur
Konu Başlıkları
[dc.subject]
TURP
Konu Başlıkları
[dc.subject]
TUVRP
Konu Başlıkları
[dc.subject]
Vapor cut electrode
Konu Başlıkları
[dc.subject]
Vaporization of prostate
Haklar
[dc.rights]
info:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess
ISSN
[dc.identifier.issn]
1300-5804
İlk Sayfa Sayısı
[dc.identifier.startpage]
481
Son Sayfa Sayısı
[dc.identifier.endpage]
485
Dergi Adı
[dc.relation.journal]
Turk Uroloji Dergisi
Dergi Sayısı
[dc.identifier.issue]
4
Dergi Cilt Bilgisi
[dc.identifier.volume]
29
Tek Biçim Adres
[dc.identifier.uri]
https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12628/4715
Görüntülenme Şehir
Görüntülenme Ülke
İndirme Şehir
İndirme Ülke
Görüntülenme & İndirme
Görüntülenme
3
09.12.2022 tarihinden bu yana
İndirme
1
09.12.2022 tarihinden bu yana
Son Erişim Tarihi
02 Mayıs 2023 11:33
Google Kontrol
Tıklayınız
Altmetric
https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12628/4715">
prostate bladder groups prostatic enlargement analysis Wilcoxon treatment obstruction transrectal outlet symptomatic volume Patients compare results transurethral resection during patients efficacy Results respect parameters Introduction postoperative recorded (Qmax) post-voiding residual ultrasound follow-up preoperative period variance
6698 sayılı Kişisel Verilerin Korunması Kanunu kapsamında yükümlülüklerimiz ve çerez politikamız hakkında bilgi sahibi olmak için alttaki bağlantıyı kullanabilirsiniz.


Bu site altında yer alan tüm kaynaklar Creative Commons Alıntı-GayriTicari-Türetilemez 4.0 Uluslararası Lisansı ile lisanslanmıştır.