Introduction: To investigate clinical characteristics of microtropia. Methods: Twenty patients with primary microtropia were studied. Results: Irvine prism test was positive in all the patients by using prisms of different strengths and positions. All the patients had abnormal fusion at near. At distance, 15 patients had abnormal fusion by the BSG and 8 patients had abnormal fusion by the W4D. Ten patients had gross stereopsis and the rest had no measurable stereopsis. Conclusions: All patients with microtropia have abnormal fusion, which does not guarantee the presence of stereopsis. The difference in fuson between near and distance is due to the weakness of fusion. With occlusion treatment, amblyopia can be improved, whereas binocular defects of microtropia can not be improved.
Yazar |
Tomac, S Sener, EC Sanac, AS |
Yayın Türü | Conference Object |
Tek Biçim Adres | https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12628/2235 |
Konu Başlıkları |
abnormal retinal corespondence
microtropia stereopsis |
Koleksiyonlar |
Araştırma Çıktıları | WoS | Scopus | TR-Dizin | PubMed | SOBİAD WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu |
Dergi Adı | TRANSACTIONS: 27TH MEETING OF THE EUROPEAN STRABISMOLOGICAL ASSOCIATION |
Sayfalar | 77 - 80 |
Yayın Yılı | 2001 |
Eser Adı [dc.title] | Clinical characteristics of microtropia |
Yayıncı [dc.publisher] | SWETS AND ZEITLINGER B V |
Yayın Türü [dc.type] | conferenceObject |
Açıklama [dc.description] | 27th Annual Meeting of the European-Strabismological-Association -- JUN 06-09, 2001 -- FLORENCE, ITALY |
Açıklama [dc.description] | WOS: 000181916200021 |
Özet [dc.description.abstract] | Introduction: To investigate clinical characteristics of microtropia. Methods: Twenty patients with primary microtropia were studied. Results: Irvine prism test was positive in all the patients by using prisms of different strengths and positions. All the patients had abnormal fusion at near. At distance, 15 patients had abnormal fusion by the BSG and 8 patients had abnormal fusion by the W4D. Ten patients had gross stereopsis and the rest had no measurable stereopsis. Conclusions: All patients with microtropia have abnormal fusion, which does not guarantee the presence of stereopsis. The difference in fuson between near and distance is due to the weakness of fusion. With occlusion treatment, amblyopia can be improved, whereas binocular defects of microtropia can not be improved. |
Kayıt Giriş Tarihi [dc.date.accessioned] | 2019-12-23 |
Açık Erişim Tarihi [dc.date.available] | 2019-12-23 |
Yayın Yılı [dc.date.issued] | 2001 |
Tek Biçim Adres [dc.identifier.uri] | https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12628/2235 |
Yayın Dili [dc.language.iso] | eng |
Konu Başlıkları [dc.subject] | abnormal retinal corespondence |
Konu Başlıkları [dc.subject] | microtropia |
Konu Başlıkları [dc.subject] | stereopsis |
Yazar [dc.contributor.author] | Tomac, S |
Yazar [dc.contributor.author] | Sener, EC |
Yazar [dc.contributor.author] | Sanac, AS |
Haklar [dc.rights] | info:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess |
Sponsor YAYINCI [dc.description.sponsorship] | European Strabismol Assoc |
Yazar Departmanı [dc.contributor.department] | Zonguldak Bülent Ecevit Üniversitesi |
İlk Sayfa Sayısı [dc.identifier.startpage] | 77 |
Son Sayfa Sayısı [dc.identifier.endpage] | 80 |
Dergi Adı [dc.relation.journal] | TRANSACTIONS: 27TH MEETING OF THE EUROPEAN STRABISMOLOGICAL ASSOCIATION |
ISBN [dc.identifier.isbn] | 90-265-1922-2 |